Resources
Delving Into the Books
Unifying Theory
by Leroyal Terrell Gould, III

I have, for some time, been speculating on just why Voldemort would single out a child for destruction. There is, of course, the much talked about "Heir of Gryffindor" theory, but for me, this doesn't hold with JKR's theme of our choices making us who we are, and not innate qualities. So, like any good HP fan, I have my own little theory, which, I have come to jokingly refer to as my "Unifying Theory" (a pun which makes me chuckle, and that, hopefully you'll understand shortly, especially if you are familiar with the social sciences). 

I asked myself, firstly, what could have been LV's motivation. Its seems obvious that he is attempting to get rid of an obstacle impeding 
his path to power. Does he need any other reason? Sheer malice or sadism, maybe, but why be so specific about Harry and his family? The 
existence of James and Harry (but, it appears, not Lily) seem to be in the way of LV's plans, but, why? 

A core theme of the books, thus far, I believe, has been schisms within a people due to groups they belong to or things associated with 
them. Not only do we find race issues in the wizarding community (Mudblood vs. Pureblood), but we also see very distinct and purposeful 
separations between the houses at Hogwarts, socio-economic classes in the community (Malfoys vs. Weasleys), and between those afflicted
with "non-human" characteristics (e.g: werewolves and half giants) and normal wizards. LV feeds off of these prejudices. He uses them (the preexisting prejudices within the community) to promote his own causes and hatreds, and to create strong and powerful allies with established wizarding families, through which, he will gain power. 

What could possibly destroy these dark alliances he has created more so than "unity" within the wizarding community. Could it possibly be that Harry's place is not to destroy LV and the DE's in a final, apocalyptic duel of archetypical proportions, but to, rather, destroy what is at the core of their evil ways: hatred and mistrust of those who are different.

I offer for evidence the scene of Harry's sorting in SS/PS. 

"Hmm, Difficult. Very Difficult. Plenty of courage, I see. Not a bad mind, either. There's talent, oh my goodness, yes - and a nice thirst to prove yourself, now that's interesting...."
I find this interesting, because, in my interpretation, the hat is quite literally saying that Harry could be placed into any one of the four Hogwarts houses. "Plenty of courage" is an obvious reference to Gryffindor house. "Not a bad mind" is a nod towards Ravenclaw the house of intellectuals. "Talent", I believe, is a quality belonging to Hufflepuffs, who, are "unafraid of toil". I see, with the thought of talent, that prematurely departed hero of Hufflepuff house (and his father) Cedric Diggory, who seemed to excel at everything through his talent. Finally, that wisest of hats mentions "a nice thirst to prove yourself" (referring to Harry). This, to me, seems like a very Slytherin quality, as a need for approval and recognition could very well fuel many attempts to gain those things by any means accessible. 

There has already been much play on the similarities between Harry and LV (especially in CoS by Tom Riddle and Harry, himself). These 
musings, as well as the sorting scene, I think, are reflections on the duality of Harry. He embodies two worlds. The muggle world he grew up 
in, and the wizarding world who has cherished his existence since that fateful Hallowe'en. Who better to serve as an intermediary between 
two worlds than someone who walks in both of them (this certainly explains one of the reasons that Dumbledore may have had for Harry 
staying with the dreadful Dursleys). It is interesting to note that LV also was raised in a fashion much like Harry (as an orphan and completely separate of the wizarding world).

Not only does Harry stride both in magical and non-magical worlds, but within him also resides essence of the heir of Slytherin (due to LV's 
reflected AK, as indicated by his status as a parseltongue), and that of Gryffindor (Dumbledore says that "only a true Gryffindor" could have pulled the sword from the sorting hat in CoS). 

Begin to look at the people Harry has chosen to surround himself with, also. A half-giant, a werewolf, a mudblood, a very poor wizard, and
an escaped convict (not to mention a freed house-elf and a pseudo-squib, a.k.a. Neville Longbottom). Why should the shining star of the 
wizarding world, born of such beloved and powerful parents, associate with those so far "below" him (at least by the magical communities 
social standards)? Because he chooses to.

So, Harry has had to find an equilibrium with his dual natures. Why would his greatest accomplishment and gift to the world not be to
help it do the same? 

Harry is already on a very different path than LV, who faced, I am sure, many of the same problems due to his duality as Harry has (the 
disbelief, confusion, prejudice, and feelings of inferiority). It has been quite clear ever since Harry's sorting ("Not Slytherin, not Slytherin!") from the choices they have both made that, though they may be taken from the same mold, Harry and Lord Voldemort are of very different qualities altogether. LV as the proprietor of separation, and Harry as the unifier of opposites. Destruction versus Creation. Yin versus Yang. Death versus Life. 

Though the path which will lead to it is unclear at this time, the archetype of the divine marriage may very well reside in the pages of future books.

copyright 2002 Leroyal Terrell Gould, III


original content © 2002 The Harry Potter Lexicon and Leroyal Terrell Gould, III
HARRY POTTER, characters, names, and all related indicia are trademarks of Warner Bros. © 2001.
NO PART OF THIS PAGE MAY BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT PERMISSION
original page date 3/11/02
last page update 3/11/02